TY - JOUR
T1 - Anaerobic sequencing batch reactor as an alternative for the biological treatment of wine distillery effluents
AU - Donoso-Bravo, Andrés
AU - Rosenkranz, Francisca
AU - Valdivia, Viviana
AU - Torrijos, Michel
AU - Ruiz-Filippi, Gonzalo
AU - Chamy, Rolando
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - The goal of this study was to assess the effect of different modes of operation and configurations of Anaerobic Sequencing Batch Reactors (ASBRs) treating phenolic wastewater. Several lab-scale reactors were used in the mesophilic range. The reactors were fed with synthetic wastewater with a COD of 5 g/L using phenol as a carbon source (variable concentration) and glucose as a co-substrate. One and two-phase (hydrolytic/acidogenic-methanogenic) systems in batch and fed-batch operation were evaluated. The one-stage reactor operated by the fed batch (which was the only configuration using phenol as a sole carbon source), presented better results for the removal of phenol, reaching 100% removal in 10 days at a concentration of 210mg/L. The two-stage configuration had removal percentages near 100%, but the methanogenic reactor presented greater degradation of the remaining phenol not removed in the hydrolytic/acidogenic reactor. ASBRs might be a feasible alternative to treat this type of effluent due to their operational flexibility.
AB - The goal of this study was to assess the effect of different modes of operation and configurations of Anaerobic Sequencing Batch Reactors (ASBRs) treating phenolic wastewater. Several lab-scale reactors were used in the mesophilic range. The reactors were fed with synthetic wastewater with a COD of 5 g/L using phenol as a carbon source (variable concentration) and glucose as a co-substrate. One and two-phase (hydrolytic/acidogenic-methanogenic) systems in batch and fed-batch operation were evaluated. The one-stage reactor operated by the fed batch (which was the only configuration using phenol as a sole carbon source), presented better results for the removal of phenol, reaching 100% removal in 10 days at a concentration of 210mg/L. The two-stage configuration had removal percentages near 100%, but the methanogenic reactor presented greater degradation of the remaining phenol not removed in the hydrolytic/acidogenic reactor. ASBRs might be a feasible alternative to treat this type of effluent due to their operational flexibility.
KW - Acidogenic
KW - Anaerobic digestion
KW - Hydrolysis
KW - Phenol
KW - Two-phase
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350493131&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2166/wst.2009.565
DO - 10.2166/wst.2009.565
M3 - Article
C2 - 19717901
AN - SCOPUS:70350493131
SN - 0273-1223
VL - 60
SP - 1155
EP - 1160
JO - Water Science and Technology
JF - Water Science and Technology
IS - 5
ER -