TY - JOUR
T1 - Children and childhood in Chile
T2 - Social worker perspectives
AU - Jensen, Ida Bruheim
AU - Ellingsen, Ingunn T.
AU - Studsrød, Ingunn
AU - Quiroga, Manuela Garcia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 University of Stavanger, Department of Social Studies.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - This study explores understandings of children and childhood among 21 social workers from five child protection services in Chile. To help grasp multiple ideas about children and childhood, we use Q methodology and the 'child visibility' concept. The object is to explore dissimilar and/or similar views on child visibility among social workers and the characteristics of these viewpoints. The results reveal three distinct views on child visibility. Based on the characteristics of these perspectives, we have conceptualized the workers associated with them as: activists, buffers and experts. The activists vigorously seek children's own perspectives, and produce an image of capable children with unique perspectives. The buffers and the experts, however, typically define children's needs from their own perspectives. Nevertheless, through differing logics, the experts focus on children's vulnerability and protection needs, while the buffers are more inclined to view children in terms of their contextual risk and on the margins in an underfunded child protection context. Despite these differences, there are shared viewpoints among the social workers, for example, by understanding children as relational. The results are discussed in light of current theory within childhood studies.
AB - This study explores understandings of children and childhood among 21 social workers from five child protection services in Chile. To help grasp multiple ideas about children and childhood, we use Q methodology and the 'child visibility' concept. The object is to explore dissimilar and/or similar views on child visibility among social workers and the characteristics of these viewpoints. The results reveal three distinct views on child visibility. Based on the characteristics of these perspectives, we have conceptualized the workers associated with them as: activists, buffers and experts. The activists vigorously seek children's own perspectives, and produce an image of capable children with unique perspectives. The buffers and the experts, however, typically define children's needs from their own perspectives. Nevertheless, through differing logics, the experts focus on children's vulnerability and protection needs, while the buffers are more inclined to view children in terms of their contextual risk and on the margins in an underfunded child protection context. Despite these differences, there are shared viewpoints among the social workers, for example, by understanding children as relational. The results are discussed in light of current theory within childhood studies.
KW - Child protection
KW - Chile
KW - Q methodology
KW - Social workers
KW - Understandings of children and childhood
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066146185&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.31265/jcsw.v14.i1.236
DO - 10.31265/jcsw.v14.i1.236
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85066146185
SN - 0809-9936
VL - 14
SP - 1
EP - 24
JO - Journal of Comparative Social Work
JF - Journal of Comparative Social Work
IS - 1
ER -