TY - JOUR
T1 - Deprotection reagents in Fmoc solid phase peptide synthesis
T2 - Moving away from piperidine?
AU - Luna, Omar F.
AU - Gomez, Johana
AU - Cárdenas, Constanza
AU - Albericio, Fernando
AU - Marshall, Sergio H.
AU - Guzmán, Fanny
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI.
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - The deprotection step is crucial in order to secure a good quality product in Fmoc solid phase peptide synthesis. 9-Fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl (Fmoc) removal is achieved by a two-step mechanism reaction favored by the use of cyclic secondary amines; however, the efficiency of the reaction could be affected by side reactions and by-product formation. Several aspects have to be taken into consideration when selecting a deprotection reagent: its physicochemical behavior, basicity (pKa) and polarity, concentration, and time of reaction, toxicity and disposability of residues and, finally, availability of reagents. This report presents a comparison of the performance of three strategies for deprotection using microwave-assisted Fmoc peptide synthesis. Four peptide sequences were synthesized using Rink amide resin with a Liberty Blue™ automated synthesizer and 4-methylpiperidine (4MP), piperidine (PP), and piperazine (PZ) as Fmoc removal reagents. In the first instance all three reagents behaved similarly. A detailed analysis showed a correlation between the hydrophobicity and size of the peptide with the yield and purity of the obtained product. The three reagents are interchangeable, and replacement of piperidine could be advantageous regarding toxicity and reagent handling.
AB - The deprotection step is crucial in order to secure a good quality product in Fmoc solid phase peptide synthesis. 9-Fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl (Fmoc) removal is achieved by a two-step mechanism reaction favored by the use of cyclic secondary amines; however, the efficiency of the reaction could be affected by side reactions and by-product formation. Several aspects have to be taken into consideration when selecting a deprotection reagent: its physicochemical behavior, basicity (pKa) and polarity, concentration, and time of reaction, toxicity and disposability of residues and, finally, availability of reagents. This report presents a comparison of the performance of three strategies for deprotection using microwave-assisted Fmoc peptide synthesis. Four peptide sequences were synthesized using Rink amide resin with a Liberty Blue™ automated synthesizer and 4-methylpiperidine (4MP), piperidine (PP), and piperazine (PZ) as Fmoc removal reagents. In the first instance all three reagents behaved similarly. A detailed analysis showed a correlation between the hydrophobicity and size of the peptide with the yield and purity of the obtained product. The three reagents are interchangeable, and replacement of piperidine could be advantageous regarding toxicity and reagent handling.
KW - 4-Methylpiperidine
KW - N-α-deprotection reagent
KW - Piperazine
KW - Piperidine
KW - Solid-phase peptide synthesis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84997403821&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/molecules21111542
DO - 10.3390/molecules21111542
M3 - Article
C2 - 27854291
AN - SCOPUS:84997403821
SN - 1420-3049
VL - 21
JO - Molecules
JF - Molecules
IS - 11
M1 - 1542
ER -