Desarrollo de la argumentación infantil: Cambios en la dinámica interaccional y en los procesos inferenciales subyacentes

Sandra Pérez Pérez; NINA MARIA CRESPO ALLENDE

doi:10.32735/S0718-2201202100052885

Desarrollo de la argumentación infantil: Cambios en la dinámica interaccional y en los procesos inferenciales subyacentes

Translated title of the contribution: Development of children argumentation: Changes in interactional dynamics and underlying inferential processes

Sandra Pérez Pérez, NINA MARIA CRESPO ALLENDE

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This paper presents a preliminary and qualitative case study, which considers the argumentative dialogical exchanges, given in a moral dilemma task, of six pairs of boys and girls (5, 8 and 11 years old). The analysis of the information is based on two approaches (Palmieri, 2014), Analytical Overview (AO) of the Pragmadialectics, and the Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT) of Lugano School. The results indicated that all groups are able to defend their position with at least one argument. However, as schoolchildren grow up, they build much more elaborate argumentation structures and increase the diversity of loci used. It is concluded that the AO and the AMT have proved to be useful tools to describe the argumentative development of schoolchildren as they get older.

Translated title of the contribution	Development of children argumentation: Changes in interactional dynamics and underlying inferential processes
Original language	Spanish
Pages (from-to)	91-110
Number of pages	20
Journal	Alpha
Volume	2021
Issue number	52
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.32735/S0718-2201202100052885
State	Published - Jul 2021
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.32735/S0718-2201202100052885

Cite this

@article{174e3db15ba14383be58f3d11024c3ee,

title = "Desarrollo de la argumentaci{\'o}n infantil: Cambios en la din{\'a}mica interaccional y en los procesos inferenciales subyacentes",

abstract = "This paper presents a preliminary and qualitative case study, which considers the argumentative dialogical exchanges, given in a moral dilemma task, of six pairs of boys and girls (5, 8 and 11 years old). The analysis of the information is based on two approaches (Palmieri, 2014), Analytical Overview (AO) of the Pragmadialectics, and the Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT) of Lugano School. The results indicated that all groups are able to defend their position with at least one argument. However, as schoolchildren grow up, they build much more elaborate argumentation structures and increase the diversity of loci used. It is concluded that the AO and the AMT have proved to be useful tools to describe the argumentative development of schoolchildren as they get older.",

keywords = "Argumentative structure, Children{\textquoteright}s dialogic argumentation, Loci",

author = "P{\'e}rez, {Sandra P{\'e}rez} and {CRESPO ALLENDE}, {NINA MARIA}",

year = "2021",

month = jul,

doi = "10.32735/S0718-2201202100052885",

language = "Spanish",

volume = "2021",

pages = "91--110",

journal = "Alpha",

issn = "0716-4254",

number = "52",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Desarrollo de la argumentación infantil

T2 - Cambios en la dinámica interaccional y en los procesos inferenciales subyacentes

AU - Pérez, Sandra Pérez

AU - CRESPO ALLENDE, NINA MARIA

PY - 2021/7

Y1 - 2021/7

N2 - This paper presents a preliminary and qualitative case study, which considers the argumentative dialogical exchanges, given in a moral dilemma task, of six pairs of boys and girls (5, 8 and 11 years old). The analysis of the information is based on two approaches (Palmieri, 2014), Analytical Overview (AO) of the Pragmadialectics, and the Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT) of Lugano School. The results indicated that all groups are able to defend their position with at least one argument. However, as schoolchildren grow up, they build much more elaborate argumentation structures and increase the diversity of loci used. It is concluded that the AO and the AMT have proved to be useful tools to describe the argumentative development of schoolchildren as they get older.

AB - This paper presents a preliminary and qualitative case study, which considers the argumentative dialogical exchanges, given in a moral dilemma task, of six pairs of boys and girls (5, 8 and 11 years old). The analysis of the information is based on two approaches (Palmieri, 2014), Analytical Overview (AO) of the Pragmadialectics, and the Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT) of Lugano School. The results indicated that all groups are able to defend their position with at least one argument. However, as schoolchildren grow up, they build much more elaborate argumentation structures and increase the diversity of loci used. It is concluded that the AO and the AMT have proved to be useful tools to describe the argumentative development of schoolchildren as they get older.

KW - Argumentative structure

KW - Children’s dialogic argumentation

KW - Loci

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111777479&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.32735/S0718-2201202100052885

DO - 10.32735/S0718-2201202100052885

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85111777479

VL - 2021

SP - 91

EP - 110

JO - Alpha

JF - Alpha

SN - 0716-4254

IS - 52

ER -

Desarrollo de la argumentación infantil: Cambios en la dinámica interaccional y en los procesos inferenciales subyacentes

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this