Desarrollo de la argumentación infantil: Cambios en la dinámica interaccional y en los procesos inferenciales subyacentes

Translated title of the contribution: Development of children argumentation: Changes in interactional dynamics and underlying inferential processes

Sandra Pérez Pérez, NINA MARIA CRESPO ALLENDE

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper presents a preliminary and qualitative case study, which considers the argumentative dialogical exchanges, given in a moral dilemma task, of six pairs of boys and girls (5, 8 and 11 years old). The analysis of the information is based on two approaches (Palmieri, 2014), Analytical Overview (AO) of the Pragmadialectics, and the Argumentum Model of Topics (AMT) of Lugano School. The results indicated that all groups are able to defend their position with at least one argument. However, as schoolchildren grow up, they build much more elaborate argumentation structures and increase the diversity of loci used. It is concluded that the AO and the AMT have proved to be useful tools to describe the argumentative development of schoolchildren as they get older.

Translated title of the contributionDevelopment of children argumentation: Changes in interactional dynamics and underlying inferential processes
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)91-110
Number of pages20
JournalAlpha
Volume2021
Issue number52
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2021
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development of children argumentation: Changes in interactional dynamics and underlying inferential processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this