TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of three-way fluorescence data-based for simultaneous determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in tea infusion samples at sub-ppb levels by second-order multivariate calibration
AU - Bravo, Manuel A.
AU - Gonzalez L., Albani
AU - Valverde O., Bárbara
AU - Quiroz V., Waldo
AU - Toledo-Neira, Carla
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier B.V.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/12
Y1 - 2019/12
N2 - In this work, two fast and low solvent-consumption analytical methods were evaluated for the determination of the eight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), commonly named PAH8, in tea infusion samples by second-order multivariate calibration. The analytical performance of the excitation-emission matrix fluorescence (EEMF) and retention time-emission spectra matrices (RTEFM) data was compared, and these methods were applied to the analysis of real samples. Better figures of merit were obtained with EEMF (detection limit: 0.05–0.22 μg L−1; analytical sensitivity: 14.8–68.9) than with those of RTEFM (detection limit: 1.5–12.1 μg L−1; analytical sensitivity: 0.4–4.9). However, in the analysis of tea infusion samples, the method based on RTEFM showed a lower prediction error (4.0–9.7%) and better accuracy than did the reference method. Finally, the proposed methods were applied to real tea infusions obtained from green and black tea samples containing PAHs at ng L−1 levels, including a preconcentration step on a C-18 SPE cartridge, demonstrating the analytical potential of these methods.
AB - In this work, two fast and low solvent-consumption analytical methods were evaluated for the determination of the eight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), commonly named PAH8, in tea infusion samples by second-order multivariate calibration. The analytical performance of the excitation-emission matrix fluorescence (EEMF) and retention time-emission spectra matrices (RTEFM) data was compared, and these methods were applied to the analysis of real samples. Better figures of merit were obtained with EEMF (detection limit: 0.05–0.22 μg L−1; analytical sensitivity: 14.8–68.9) than with those of RTEFM (detection limit: 1.5–12.1 μg L−1; analytical sensitivity: 0.4–4.9). However, in the analysis of tea infusion samples, the method based on RTEFM showed a lower prediction error (4.0–9.7%) and better accuracy than did the reference method. Finally, the proposed methods were applied to real tea infusions obtained from green and black tea samples containing PAHs at ng L−1 levels, including a preconcentration step on a C-18 SPE cartridge, demonstrating the analytical potential of these methods.
KW - Fluorescence spectroscopy
KW - Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
KW - Second order multivariate calibration
KW - Tea infusion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071624267&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.microc.2019.104208
DO - 10.1016/j.microc.2019.104208
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85071624267
SN - 0026-265X
VL - 151
JO - Microchemical Journal
JF - Microchemical Journal
M1 - 104208
ER -