TY - JOUR
T1 - Fruit load in almond spurs define starch and total soluble carbohydrate concentration and therefore their survival and bloom probabilities in the next season
AU - Fernandez, Eduardo
AU - Baird, Graeme
AU - Farías, Daniela
AU - Oyanedel, Eduardo
AU - Olaeta, José A.
AU - Brown, Patrick
AU - Zwieniecki, Maciej
AU - Tixier, Aude
AU - Saa, Sebastian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2018/7/14
Y1 - 2018/7/14
N2 - Nonpareil almonds trees have compact shoots, known as spurs. Spurs are the main bearing structure of many fruit trees. However, in almonds, spurs show alternate bearing and low winter survival if fruit load is high or if leaf area is low at the spur level. To better understand the source sink relationships that govern the effects of fruit load on spur survival and return bloom, a total of 1920 spurs with varying fruit load (non-fruiting spurs, one fruiting spurs, two fruiting spurs, and one fruiting spurs de-fruited at 40 and 70 days after full bloom) were labeled and tracked for two seasons in fully mature trees. Spur variables such as leaf area, total soluble carbohydrates (TSC), starch concentration, winter survival and return bloom were collected and analyzed with generalized linear mixed models and structural equation models. Starch concentration in non-fruiting spurs (excluding de-fruited spurs) was twice as high as starch concentration of fruiting spurs. Similarly, in the following season, the probabilities of survival and bloom in non-fruiting spurs were 55% and 61% higher than fruiting spurs, respectively. Structural equation modeling suggests that starch concentration in a spur is correlated with spur leaf area, number of fruits, fruit weight, and TSC. Thus, this work improves our understanding of return bloom and winter spur survival.
AB - Nonpareil almonds trees have compact shoots, known as spurs. Spurs are the main bearing structure of many fruit trees. However, in almonds, spurs show alternate bearing and low winter survival if fruit load is high or if leaf area is low at the spur level. To better understand the source sink relationships that govern the effects of fruit load on spur survival and return bloom, a total of 1920 spurs with varying fruit load (non-fruiting spurs, one fruiting spurs, two fruiting spurs, and one fruiting spurs de-fruited at 40 and 70 days after full bloom) were labeled and tracked for two seasons in fully mature trees. Spur variables such as leaf area, total soluble carbohydrates (TSC), starch concentration, winter survival and return bloom were collected and analyzed with generalized linear mixed models and structural equation models. Starch concentration in non-fruiting spurs (excluding de-fruited spurs) was twice as high as starch concentration of fruiting spurs. Similarly, in the following season, the probabilities of survival and bloom in non-fruiting spurs were 55% and 61% higher than fruiting spurs, respectively. Structural equation modeling suggests that starch concentration in a spur is correlated with spur leaf area, number of fruits, fruit weight, and TSC. Thus, this work improves our understanding of return bloom and winter spur survival.
KW - Flowering
KW - Leaf area
KW - Nonpareil almonds
KW - Spur dynamics
KW - Starch concentration
KW - Total soluble sugars
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045724654&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.04.030
DO - 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.04.030
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85045724654
SN - 0304-4238
VL - 237
SP - 269
EP - 276
JO - Scientia Horticulturae
JF - Scientia Horticulturae
ER -