TY - JOUR
T1 - Inoculation and start-up of a biotricking filter removing dimethyl sulfide
AU - Sercu, Bram
AU - Núñez, Dariela
AU - Aroca, Germán
AU - Boon, Nico
AU - Verstraete, Willy
AU - Van Langenhove, Herman
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by a scholarship from the Institute for the Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology in Flanders (IWT-Vlaanderen) and by the alfa network ‘Food and bioprocess engineering for sustainability and quality’. The authors also wish to thank Kaldnes Miljøteknologi AS (Tønsberg, Norway) for providing the carrier rings.
PY - 2005/10/20
Y1 - 2005/10/20
N2 - Two Hyphomicrobium VS inoculation protocols were compared for start-up of a biotrickling filter removing dimethyl sulfide (DMS). One biotrickling filter (HBF 1) was filled with rings that were submerged in a nutrient medium containing Hyphomicrobium VS fed with DMS, another biotrickling filter (HBF 2) was similarly filled with rings that were submerged in nutrient medium, but continuously supplied with actively growing Hyphomicrobium VS and fed with methanol. Initially, about 40 times more Hyphomicrobium VS cells were attached to the rings in HBF 2. During the experiment, two to three times more Hyphomicrobium VS cells were still found to be present on the rings in HBF 2 compared to HBF 1. The maximal DMS elimination capacity at 90% removal efficiency of HBF 1 was 7.2 g m-3 h-1 after 30 days of operation. The elimination capacity decreased, however, when the inlet loading rate exceeded 15 g m-3 h-1 (200 ppmv inlet concentration). The performance of HBF 2 was much better, with an elimination capacity of 8.3 g m-3 h-1 (90% removal efficiency) after 2 days of operation, increasing to a maximum of 57 g m-3 h-1 at 92% removal efficiency. Microbial community analysis with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis showed very different microbial communities in both biotrickling filters (Pearson correlation coefficient of 0%). Moreover, the decreased DMS elimination capacity of HBF 1 at higher influent loading rate corresponded with a drastic change of the microbial community on the rings. The latter observations suggest that the functional efficiency of the microbial community in a biotrickling filter can be related to its composition.
AB - Two Hyphomicrobium VS inoculation protocols were compared for start-up of a biotrickling filter removing dimethyl sulfide (DMS). One biotrickling filter (HBF 1) was filled with rings that were submerged in a nutrient medium containing Hyphomicrobium VS fed with DMS, another biotrickling filter (HBF 2) was similarly filled with rings that were submerged in nutrient medium, but continuously supplied with actively growing Hyphomicrobium VS and fed with methanol. Initially, about 40 times more Hyphomicrobium VS cells were attached to the rings in HBF 2. During the experiment, two to three times more Hyphomicrobium VS cells were still found to be present on the rings in HBF 2 compared to HBF 1. The maximal DMS elimination capacity at 90% removal efficiency of HBF 1 was 7.2 g m-3 h-1 after 30 days of operation. The elimination capacity decreased, however, when the inlet loading rate exceeded 15 g m-3 h-1 (200 ppmv inlet concentration). The performance of HBF 2 was much better, with an elimination capacity of 8.3 g m-3 h-1 (90% removal efficiency) after 2 days of operation, increasing to a maximum of 57 g m-3 h-1 at 92% removal efficiency. Microbial community analysis with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis showed very different microbial communities in both biotrickling filters (Pearson correlation coefficient of 0%). Moreover, the decreased DMS elimination capacity of HBF 1 at higher influent loading rate corresponded with a drastic change of the microbial community on the rings. The latter observations suggest that the functional efficiency of the microbial community in a biotrickling filter can be related to its composition.
KW - Biotrickling filter
KW - Dimethyl sulfide
KW - Hyphomicrobium VS
KW - Inoculation
KW - Microbial ecology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27144511171&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cej.2005.04.008
DO - 10.1016/j.cej.2005.04.008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:27144511171
SN - 1385-8947
VL - 113
SP - 127
EP - 134
JO - Chemical Engineering Journal
JF - Chemical Engineering Journal
IS - 2-3
ER -