TY - JOUR
T1 - Operational and microbiological aspects of a bioaugmented two-stage biotrickling filter removing hydrogen sulfide and dimethyl sulfide
AU - Sercu, B.
AU - Núñez, D.
AU - Van Langenhove, Herman
AU - Aroca, G.
AU - Verstraete, W.
PY - 2005/4/20
Y1 - 2005/4/20
N2 - A two-stage biotrickling filter was developed for removing dimethyl sulfide (DMS) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S). The first biotrickling filter (ABF) was inoculated with Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans and operated without pH control, while the second biotrickling filter (HBF) was inoculated with Hyphomicrobium VS and operated at neutral pH. High DMS elimination capacities were observed in the HBF (8.2 g DMS m-3 h-1 at 90% removal efficiency) after 2 days. Maximal observed elimination capacities were 83 g H2S m-3 h-1 (100% removal efficiency) and 58 g DMS m-3 h-1 (88% removal efficiency) for the ABF and the HBF, respectively. The influence of a decreasing empty bed residence time (120 down to 30 sec) and the robustness of the HBF towards changing operational parameters (low pH, starvation, and DMS and H2S peak loadings) were investigated. Suboptimal operational conditions rapidly resulted in lower DMS removal efficiencies, but recovery of the HBF was mostly obtained within a few days. The H2S removal efficiency in the ABF, however, was not influenced by varying operational conditions. In both reactors, microbial community dynamics of the biofilm and the suspended bacteria were investigated, using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). After a period of gradual change, a stable microbial community was observed in the HBF after 60 days, although Hyphomicrobium VS was not the dominant microorganism. In contrast, the ABF biofilm community was stable from the first day and only a limited bacterial diversity was observed. The planktonic microbial community in the HBF was very different from that in the biofilm.
AB - A two-stage biotrickling filter was developed for removing dimethyl sulfide (DMS) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S). The first biotrickling filter (ABF) was inoculated with Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans and operated without pH control, while the second biotrickling filter (HBF) was inoculated with Hyphomicrobium VS and operated at neutral pH. High DMS elimination capacities were observed in the HBF (8.2 g DMS m-3 h-1 at 90% removal efficiency) after 2 days. Maximal observed elimination capacities were 83 g H2S m-3 h-1 (100% removal efficiency) and 58 g DMS m-3 h-1 (88% removal efficiency) for the ABF and the HBF, respectively. The influence of a decreasing empty bed residence time (120 down to 30 sec) and the robustness of the HBF towards changing operational parameters (low pH, starvation, and DMS and H2S peak loadings) were investigated. Suboptimal operational conditions rapidly resulted in lower DMS removal efficiencies, but recovery of the HBF was mostly obtained within a few days. The H2S removal efficiency in the ABF, however, was not influenced by varying operational conditions. In both reactors, microbial community dynamics of the biofilm and the suspended bacteria were investigated, using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). After a period of gradual change, a stable microbial community was observed in the HBF after 60 days, although Hyphomicrobium VS was not the dominant microorganism. In contrast, the ABF biofilm community was stable from the first day and only a limited bacterial diversity was observed. The planktonic microbial community in the HBF was very different from that in the biofilm.
KW - Biotrickling filter
KW - Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis
KW - Dimethyl sulfide
KW - Hydrogen sulfide
KW - Inoculation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17644371976&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/bit.20443
DO - 10.1002/bit.20443
M3 - Article
C2 - 15739171
AN - SCOPUS:17644371976
SN - 0006-3592
VL - 90
SP - 259
EP - 269
JO - Biotechnology and Bioengineering
JF - Biotechnology and Bioengineering
IS - 2
ER -