TY - JOUR
T1 - Similarity-Based Predictive Models
T2 - Sensitivity Analysis and a Biological Application with Multi-Attributes
AU - Sanchez, Jeniffer D.
AU - Rêgo, Leandro C.
AU - Ospina, Raydonal
AU - Leiva, Víctor
AU - Chesneau, Christophe
AU - Castro, Cecilia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Predictive models based on empirical similarity are instrumental in biology and data science, where the premise is to measure the likeness of one observation with others in the same dataset. Biological datasets often encompass data that can be categorized. When using empirical similarity-based predictive models, two strategies for handling categorical covariates exist. The first strategy retains categorical covariates in their original form, applying distance measures and allocating weights to each covariate. In contrast, the second strategy creates binary variables, representing each variable level independently, and computes similarity measures solely through the Euclidean distance. This study performs a sensitivity analysis of these two strategies using computational simulations, and applies the results to a biological context. We use a linear regression model as a reference point, and consider two methods for estimating the model parameters, alongside exponential and fractional inverse similarity functions. The sensitivity is evaluated by determining the coefficient of variation of the parameter estimators across the three models as a measure of relative variability. Our results suggest that the first strategy excels over the second one in effectively dealing with categorical variables, and offers greater parsimony due to the use of fewer parameters.
AB - Predictive models based on empirical similarity are instrumental in biology and data science, where the premise is to measure the likeness of one observation with others in the same dataset. Biological datasets often encompass data that can be categorized. When using empirical similarity-based predictive models, two strategies for handling categorical covariates exist. The first strategy retains categorical covariates in their original form, applying distance measures and allocating weights to each covariate. In contrast, the second strategy creates binary variables, representing each variable level independently, and computes similarity measures solely through the Euclidean distance. This study performs a sensitivity analysis of these two strategies using computational simulations, and applies the results to a biological context. We use a linear regression model as a reference point, and consider two methods for estimating the model parameters, alongside exponential and fractional inverse similarity functions. The sensitivity is evaluated by determining the coefficient of variation of the parameter estimators across the three models as a measure of relative variability. Our results suggest that the first strategy excels over the second one in effectively dealing with categorical variables, and offers greater parsimony due to the use of fewer parameters.
KW - Monte Carlo simulation
KW - biological data
KW - coefficient of variation
KW - data science
KW - distance measures
KW - estimation methods
KW - predictive modeling
KW - similarity functions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166193447&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/biology12070959
DO - 10.3390/biology12070959
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85166193447
SN - 2079-7737
VL - 12
JO - Biology
JF - Biology
IS - 7
M1 - 959
ER -