TY - GEN
T1 - Static vs. dynamic WDM optical networks under single-cable failure conditions
AU - Beghelli, A.
AU - Leiva, A.
AU - Vallejos, R.
AU - Aravena, M.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - In this paper, the potential benefit of migrating from static to dynamic operation of WDM optical networks is quantified (in terms of wavelength requirements) for shared mesh protection schemes under single-cable failure scenarios. The static network cost (wavelength requirements) is quantified by applying a variation of the heuristic proposed in [1]. The dynamic network cost is quantified by extending the mathematical dimensioning method proposed in [2] and modifying the simulation method proposed in [3]. Results show that fault-tolerant (FT) networks without wavelength conversion benefit from dynamic operation only at low traffic loads (< 0.4). Wavelength-convertible FT dynamic networks instead require a significantly lower total number of wavelengths than the FT static networks in a wide range of traffic loads (< 0.7). Even more, the savings achieved by the dynamic operation (with respect to the static approach) when fault-tolerance capability is provided are much more significant than when such capability is not considered. We expect these results will help network operators to better understand and design future dynamic optical networks.
AB - In this paper, the potential benefit of migrating from static to dynamic operation of WDM optical networks is quantified (in terms of wavelength requirements) for shared mesh protection schemes under single-cable failure scenarios. The static network cost (wavelength requirements) is quantified by applying a variation of the heuristic proposed in [1]. The dynamic network cost is quantified by extending the mathematical dimensioning method proposed in [2] and modifying the simulation method proposed in [3]. Results show that fault-tolerant (FT) networks without wavelength conversion benefit from dynamic operation only at low traffic loads (< 0.4). Wavelength-convertible FT dynamic networks instead require a significantly lower total number of wavelengths than the FT static networks in a wide range of traffic loads (< 0.7). Even more, the savings achieved by the dynamic operation (with respect to the static approach) when fault-tolerance capability is provided are much more significant than when such capability is not considered. We expect these results will help network operators to better understand and design future dynamic optical networks.
KW - Dimensioning
KW - Dynamic WDM optical networks
KW - Fault-tolerance
KW - Optical burst switching
KW - Static WDM optical networks
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950961054&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:77950961054
SN - 9781424441877
T3 - 2009 International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling, ONDM 2009
BT - 2009 International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling, ONDM 2009
T2 - 2009 International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modeling, ONDM 2009
Y2 - 18 February 2009 through 20 February 2009
ER -