TY - JOUR
T1 - A low-cost photogrammetric methodology to obtain geometrical data of masonry arch bridges
AU - Morer, P.
AU - de Arteaga, I.
AU - Ortueta, A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to extend their gratitude for the financial support provided by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Education (Scientific Research under Grant No BIA2009–08012-Title: “Observatory for Masonry Arch Bridges. Management System OPAF-SIG”)
PY - 2013/11
Y1 - 2013/11
N2 - The geometry of bridges is one of the parameters that define their structural strength. The geometry of modern bridges is the result of computer-aided design (CAD) modelling and computer-aided engineering analysis and, in consequence, the collapse loads are well-known. For ancient bridges (i.e. masonry arched bridges), when the CAD geometry is unavailable; it becomes necessary to find a methodology that facilitates the acquisition of such data in order to determine the critical loads. This works aims to develop a low cost photogrammetric methodology for acquiring the geometrical data of masonry arched bridges. This methodology was applied to 20 arches of 11 masonry bridges and the results compared against the classic approach with planimetric method using a Leica TCRM 1205 Total Station. The maximum error in the span could reach 2.32% in the case of the image with greater perspective. Based on the acquired geometry, and in terms of strength, the structural analysis for the different bridges shows that the average error in the load capacity between both methodologies is 4.01%, while the average difference for the load positioning is 5.54%.
AB - The geometry of bridges is one of the parameters that define their structural strength. The geometry of modern bridges is the result of computer-aided design (CAD) modelling and computer-aided engineering analysis and, in consequence, the collapse loads are well-known. For ancient bridges (i.e. masonry arched bridges), when the CAD geometry is unavailable; it becomes necessary to find a methodology that facilitates the acquisition of such data in order to determine the critical loads. This works aims to develop a low cost photogrammetric methodology for acquiring the geometrical data of masonry arched bridges. This methodology was applied to 20 arches of 11 masonry bridges and the results compared against the classic approach with planimetric method using a Leica TCRM 1205 Total Station. The maximum error in the span could reach 2.32% in the case of the image with greater perspective. Based on the acquired geometry, and in terms of strength, the structural analysis for the different bridges shows that the average error in the load capacity between both methodologies is 4.01%, while the average difference for the load positioning is 5.54%.
KW - collapse load
KW - historic construction
KW - masonry arch
KW - structural analysis
KW - topographic and photogrammetric methods
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897873934&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13556207.2013.869974
DO - 10.1080/13556207.2013.869974
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84897873934
VL - 19
SP - 246
EP - 264
JO - Journal of Architectural Conservation
JF - Journal of Architectural Conservation
SN - 1355-6207
IS - 3
ER -