La prohibición de ir contra acto propio en la justicia civil chilena

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

Resumen

The doctrine of estoppel is a typical scenario of violation of the procedural good faith which content and limits have not been defined by the Chilean law yet. This paper analyzes both interpretations-a broad one and a narrow one-containing the civil jurisprudence regarding this duty of consistency and the way in which they affect the right to defense of the parties. The paper distinguishes between a secondary application (obiter dicta) and a residual application of this duty, the latter being a judicial control of the litigant's legal arguments in situations of abuse, deception and manifestly dilatory strategies. The procedural effect of infringing this duty is the inadmissibility of the inconsistent action. This effect is consistent with other specific measures such as the payment of costs and the compensation for damage caused.

Título traducido de la contribuciónThe doctrine of estoppel in Chilean civil justice
Idioma originalEspañol
Páginas (desde-hasta)273-296
Número de páginas24
PublicaciónRevista de Derecho
Volumen33
N.º1
DOI
EstadoPublicada - jun 2020
Publicado de forma externa

Palabras clave

  • Doctrine of estoppel
  • Procedural good faith
  • Right to defence

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'La prohibición de ir contra acto propio en la justicia civil chilena'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto